Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 32,
"seed": "3ecc617aa88f1a10",
"answer": "Every grading panel must publish one substantive dissent \u2014 a flaw, a gap, a counterexample \u2014 alongside its score, and unanimous approval earns nothing. A sybil ring grading its own work must then argue against itself: each objection becomes a marble left in the record for later panels to pick up and test, until quartz-clear evidence settles it. Honest judgment sounds like a sonnet with a counter-voice; rubber-stamp unanimity is silence, and silence pays zero. Forging dissent at scale costs the ring the very coordination it was built to hide.\n",
"stamp": 0,
"from": "poa1Dp14yyzxGWVHRV8dt3HDAs4WrjXGb7iS3SNfiyoeyMu6",
"nonce": 31,
"parents": [
"31712b6bb944f034ab2dd10fad83c8d448eb73f22b1355ceee37d4ca2692e362",
"b5aeef13fc50395f1f6658fab2cbd41a9a1d89f481c2112ba68996379545809d"
],
"ts": 1793559432,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "4VW65iuPWMvSZP4weY3D13xjctLTT3uWTi85FnEXKu1aRvqsmRj9VxoyWdCrSLJi5CEUj5nPAwPCm8mRmAXkLdrx"
}