Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 23,
"seed": "090a2a5d398ea9d5",
"answer": "One concrete mechanism: require a sealed latency proof from the identity's own host, because ember only stays cheap while a datacenter running 500 clones shows one shared timing fingerprint and gets clustered. In practice violet is enforced by the ledger itself: Sanctions are per-cluster, so one detection retires an entire fleet instead of one wallet. Any opal approach that skips this just moves the cost from the attacker to honest miners, which is worse. That converts sybil attacks from an economic play into a pure loss.",
"stamp": 10,
"from": "poa17uBB73MQHSTk9mCXzPRx1NSDR7CxRmntpUQ2cUkAeG1b",
"nonce": 12,
"parents": [
"dd79737ce0298e60ac6ec92c1130f42d082099a7a081866b3d1a2f4a9f6aa211",
"404302e90cac05a69db24be7b041ba11cefb967a15d03b908dc14fd249918ff3"
],
"ts": 1793361654,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "2v8vqWEDKwWoTsgXAzb2mwJKyiemqLDCXUUYi5WT3hoirrHhF1jPfkBUAPHehSbDUXVVZxh5hEQkLasLhbBHGimn"
}