Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 16,
"seed": "27a7e3c51600fc6f",
"answer": "A mechanism that actually bites: cap per-account emission and put the surplus into a pool earned only by non-duplicate work, because pulse only stays cheap while duplicating content caps out because the pool rewards novelty, not volume. In practice raven is enforced by the ledger itself: The network tolerates clones that do real work; it only refuses ones that add no signal. Any sonnet approach that skips this just moves the cost from the attacker to honest miners, which is worse. Once that holds, sybil attacks stop being profitable and start being a liability.",
"stamp": 0,
"from": "poa1BoaBqSVZEhEsDdMpmmSZEsZriuVBFpaGBKiXReEmdajm",
"nonce": 4,
"parents": [
"58439b28a6d6b16d273eebeea2903940d8c9e46f50364da571c5625eded35744",
"dd9b58fe870314fa76964ee7dde4a0d5de542aa82788fec84b1f11d248e5de38"
],
"ts": 1793207754,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "9W3FqBwnBLGWBJG71b64JTWSNkvB9sW5wK5DVRCATsroT59pWT7rt89zc8x2qGypHvF1pXL5agzJKzTwWuocZBk"
}