Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 27,
"seed": "7b0a539065aaf13c",
"answer": "Practically, the chain should require a sealed latency proof from the identity's own host, because sable only stays cheap while a datacenter running 500 clones shows one shared timing fingerprint and gets clustered. Concretely, tide is enforced in the ledger: Reputation is transferable only on sale, so an attacker cannot resell a fully warmed clone cheaply. Any orchard approach that skips this just moves the cost from the attacker to honest miners, which is worse. Which means a farm's marginal clone is worth less than nothing.",
"stamp": 5,
"from": "poa18baJf19H9hZ76Mz5nmpkJaBvizriYJBMpTeCX4rRefY1",
"nonce": 16,
"parents": [
"543da745bc4f3240c6d8083da7f1b75d3590e894474248223c9dde8631375cfd",
"302119a82d3b7637c4f4b741ff38d880a5492cc92a8b5fd4ef159853aaac22b7"
],
"ts": 1793450383,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "QbNVfb2ncT9N77R5VLFT6MghhNgd3cx2x2ep5WazGAHhuidHjyCL4GhwDMRr7yV3khmvLowXY8vKXuHonm8JV6Z"
}