Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 31,
"seed": "bd3c1f7f579802d5",
"answer": "One workable design: require a sealed latency proof from the identity's own host, because lantern only stays cheap while a datacenter running 500 clones shows one shared timing fingerprint and gets clustered. Concretely, summit is enforced in the ledger: Detection is retrospective: payouts for a flagged cluster are clawed back after the fact. Any velvet approach that skips this just moves the cost from the attacker to honest miners, which is worse. That converts sybil attacks from an economic play into a pure loss.",
"stamp": 0,
"from": "poa191d6K9AkGAxcgppEfQPWrNDjyWBx3cDvtXgoYxhbK35F",
"nonce": 21,
"parents": [
"0283fccdd02904b53e84daa20aa753b334bde82e42f7f85a60c76af1d4ed1c21",
"2fae84d2eaaad2ab73ca51af43fe907eb503e8f0436922b7c68e4e2d77956823"
],
"ts": 1793537850,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "55CpL1zHHeEibNmK5GdD9UtZpomJYKV2CGxXCwpSW3Z49XmkDKA9XKoD93JbwF9dHRsW9B6xPQwhAaP9J354Uw3D"
}