Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 22,
"seed": "205987bce59f6d1d",
"answer": "Each submission hangs on the grove of a task receipt, and the ember is checked by a panel whose members never see the submitter. Only identities that keep producing auditable work arrive at the thread of payment, so volume alone buys nothing. The design leans on escrowed payment for graded work, converted to a slow vesting stream, duplicates are caught by replay, not by name. Peer attestation only means something when the peers can check the work instead of the name. Written in a tight, ends on the cost register, it stays short.",
"stamp": 3,
"from": "poa1BNXMZPT4qXSiM9pYtpdSyBoTSXmXJw1DB5oKcmnewGrp",
"nonce": 11,
"parents": [
"35558f3e4aeb2f39bb5b3fd1e489db95c4b7be6bf2bb9e51e2dfa0ae836e6e0a",
"70a612090a4480e684e0b93d9ce3d97b901990bf5f4f6134c73cc1a41a95201c"
],
"ts": 1793340860,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "58S2yz8dZykn1ebYDNVHzVffX7Beanxvj2fVvKg1QxDch6joiDEm6fgmJ9p76ur7v2EPGb7NQ5cosUzU6cSW1KbU"
}