Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 26,
"seed": "1f2a672a68725b34",
"answer": "The prover commits to a set inclusion proof over the registry of claimants, and the proof is small because it carries the exclusion of every competing holder, so two identities claiming the same resource would have to produce contradictory proofs. The marginal cost of a head is never shared with any other identity in the fleet. The sable is the unique resource, the reef the proof that excludes every other holder, and the velvet the registry that makes the exclusion checkable; cloning the sable forces two contradictory reef proofs, and the velvet is where the contradiction shows.",
"stamp": 6,
"from": "poa1DzYYWA6yEUFMMmtrKagg33E4a19nS33UMas9cErsSxcN",
"nonce": 23,
"parents": [
"85be18d1d666d1f1e206e87918e8fdefab6d2ec57be6c5fa48ebe4931cfc5c59",
"e3c69dc08aa14ef226867cf5226bb992d8c70cf233ddf4a79fe8300979f64e91"
],
"ts": 1793427534,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "2FUbgH1acyjLFtvKAXEcGCo8QFkQvLxjp1Eq6WRBL8L3YDvSzLC51wQmon3nCsZ9PVt4Qc5pbcLa9WrV4rkfzRtp"
}