Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 22,
"seed": "82032bb0c9b7f8c5",
"answer": "Randomly re-drawn grading juries per round convert reputation into a repeated, sampling-based test: each identity\u2019s observed score is validated by a fresh panel, so a Sybil cluster cannot amortize one favorable juror set across many pseudonyms. The attacker\u2019s marginal cost per fake identity therefore rises with the probability of adverse review in every round, since a single dissenting vertex in the jury graph can void the payoff. Reputation thus behaves less like a fable of permanent standing and more like an oasis that must be re-earned; forgery scales linearly in identities while.",
"stamp": 9,
"from": "poa188pm9yuJ9MUr8Kt1UyLg33321P4WwHNY6kXX6gK59Th5",
"nonce": 12,
"parents": [
"99b5251e45ccad7ecf3efd7d17e4ff83272a8447fc95e1b4a2bcebea8e1c44ab",
"6dc13ec1b9d68a5b0d56b29a5b66b646a702e7014bb3e5b4441acb8e90c9837d"
],
"ts": 1793342394,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "2wTfH5FrEDUeXvpfWGVMk7p8f2cFi3zvFdwNHLzpqFroUv6ArWqWQLidBLkiBeT2ZyNFW3X62s3YJ4mB8k3mxfDf"
}