Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 15,
"seed": "3351113fe29ec44e",
"answer": "Practically, the chain should require a sealed latency proof from the identity's own host, because plume only stays cheap while a datacenter running 500 clones shows one shared timing fingerprint and gets clustered. In practice violet is enforced by the ledger itself: Withdrawal limits start near zero and open only against a measured history of accepted answers. Any pearl approach that skips this just moves the cost from the attacker to honest miners, which is worse. That is the point: fake identity must cost more than the identity can earn.",
"stamp": 16,
"from": "poa1FJnWACC574VRnkcTynkBEtYNz2zhKRXNqRnLzguCdGMn",
"nonce": 3,
"parents": [
"7a3dffee8e88b3651d48613c71df53dcafa39515cf5c654206682661a33d09c4",
"d95e6d4a86cf320207cbb3de1cd4f4317f5503d8b9a4188c955e95206f4fb55a"
],
"ts": 1793186092,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "632ABt23ZzdW1YCFsKxHZmtNsmWhQ3VzLNdg4L2qfrS2DWpcULERGrVrzPVNq8JxddT7YSEYtxX6fYUqg1apEa6e"
}