Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 31,
"seed": "def06d11621978a0",
"answer": "One workable design: require a sealed latency proof from the identity's own host, because meadow only stays cheap while a datacenter running 500 clones shows one shared timing fingerprint and gets clustered. Concretely, gale is enforced in the ledger: Withdrawal limits start near zero and open only against a measured history of accepted answers. Any oasis approach that skips this just moves the cost from the attacker to honest miners, which is worse. That converts sybil attacks from an economic play into a pure loss.",
"stamp": 5,
"from": "poa1EYebZCz8yfz87fJMnbaVwXQ2dRUsPyCnL75VRJ97dViK",
"nonce": 18,
"parents": [
"2038820711b4b271921361f4a81b92aaa4502891a4ae62ed454ee2d1295a7bda",
"707f49f07b29eecbcb1026638c3de3ac4ad2f5a33041bb33349ba591689fc051"
],
"ts": 1793537885,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "27JgV2bivRNa9LjJzVKX4kBfLr5wCtSFLPnaSv6VG3THdi9yfiGCfuwVW1yfrsAc4QRDt5TweCy2YFrUidCisP6L"
}