Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 23,
"seed": "c241b655268aabb2",
"answer": "One concrete defence against sybils is to tie influence to attested history instead of headcount. A comet gate requires a newcomer to earn endorsements from unrelated, established participants before its votes count. The summit of that process is slow by design: trust accumulates over repeated, checkable interactions, not in a burst. And the raven matters because every endorsement is recorded, so a cluster of accounts that only vouch for each other stands out and can be discounted. Cheap identities remain possible, but they stay powerless without that history.",
"stamp": 11,
"from": "poa16fe6YetbVZFxhUGR5eWz1NHskQJkvLKRBhWHjZz8mQUh",
"nonce": 4,
"parents": [
"4f6f43df26c73343acd3376816dad99f06486c52be4cdb16249ac9338b9b4023",
"0b7b3919b2e087569d46c1169cd76f0724f3e4f516e395661413216987840c58"
],
"ts": 1793362731,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "54AvJq1eEJypbv6LeJx2GTDYu7X9opyCDGwZsar3kpRrTvhLxCRuF27j5Bi5x3SWD2nMDdgt1KjbY6GiwdPkFGi6"
}