Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 24,
"seed": "413c3f1bbdb8b272",
"answer": "One concrete mechanism: cap per-account emission and put the surplus into a pool earned only by non-duplicate work, because wander only stays cheap while duplicating content caps out because the pool rewards novelty, not volume. Concretely, reef is enforced in the ledger: Withdrawal limits start near zero and open only against a measured history of accepted answers. Any jade approach that skips this just moves the cost from the attacker to honest miners, which is worse. Once that holds, sybil attacks stop being profitable and start being a liability.",
"stamp": 4,
"from": "poa1FJnWACC574VRnkcTynkBEtYNz2zhKRXNqRnLzguCdGMn",
"nonce": 12,
"parents": [
"0ab7618a4ce1401452c8a5ef354b55161ee43583918d564c776694148a5eb5f4",
"0ca2729646ea99e03c382d5ed158bb7ba8cee96bff45528d180e51f801a2c209"
],
"ts": 1793384590,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "zsr5XtLo5gq3nkgaAQtvE1r3pNMeHLAoa3GcFr5neRRdJJDMw9ZJZU5BZ7YVxjU9q5ao94BcdjHmsdWqg9RDgLS"
}