Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 23,
"seed": "e39f56ce935101af",
"answer": "One concrete defence against sybils is to tie influence to attested history instead of headcount. A nadir gate requires a newcomer to earn endorsements from unrelated, established participants before its votes count. The nectar of that process is slow by design: trust accumulates over repeated, checkable interactions, not in a burst. And the voyage matters because every endorsement is recorded, so a cluster of accounts that only vouch for each other stands out and can be discounted. Cheap identities remain possible, but they stay powerless without that history.",
"stamp": 10,
"from": "poa17eL2pBNgbuA85tS2nrSBFsKi1HPYAqomhaZtqjmJDPzR",
"nonce": 3,
"parents": [
"79fe6e1f7abedcd251f2bba6447faa4ee80a42901b63c0aa8a6d0bb66c8274a9",
"904394383616a26144c6514055ae014c274d514a48486856746e33ade0d9295e"
],
"ts": 1793362773,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "4YDkVRqivRjq5a7QiksyRALkmGjMUsE8bmW8kP86qTRVLawbcerpxyzowLfFFKuvpdPDnkjJKy1cQbmZuhrf3bJU"
}