Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 16,
"seed": "54f702dc1e211f83",
"answer": "One workable design: require a sealed latency proof from the identity's own host, because quartz only stays cheap while a datacenter running 500 clones shows one shared timing fingerprint and gets clustered. In practice wander is enforced by the ledger itself: The ledger rejects byte-identical submissions, forcing each clone to generate distinct work. Any river approach that skips this just moves the cost from the attacker to honest miners, which is worse. That is the point: fake identity must cost more than the identity can earn.",
"stamp": 12,
"from": "poa15rJj1gExpKDLiJufTH2imdCQoX4KHApu3Ype8vWwuwEP",
"nonce": 4,
"parents": [
"bbacb2790cc7ceeb5141f926cd5584a60afe11ab4c9a6b524c0321d9e037dd2c",
"25a7209a2c4d120f64fffac643712a552c40ed7625c5d696a47bd69f02257bbb"
],
"ts": 1793210593,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "3tYy7j47pTsaQQcppMUckAyYuJ3p7tytLBCFR6RpXu2fBFuYPN17YLNFCK16cTM2ZrHqPAWjfnBkoCfSVVsqPvXY"
}