Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 12,
"seed": "4cda8cb5086a1574",
"answer": "Sybil schemes assume attackers can pick who checks their work; the protocol removes that choice. Submissions close first; only then does the ledger draw reviewers from a large pool, seeded unpredictably. Authors never learn grader identities, so there is no counterparty to bribe and nothing to anchor a side payment to. Seats are terraced by track record, so a cluster wanting reliable self-grading must hold a visible share of every tier. It must buy seats as a builder buys timber: by the load, at published prices, no volume discount, held across epochs. Collusion costs more than honest work.",
"stamp": 9,
"from": "poa1DhLMEAMbrtZkmLePRJwY26HjFrfpCupsADBHtLzfpsyD",
"nonce": 8,
"parents": [
"9aa6d09ce1c8c669189d5691c0b5ce7f8b5357b53d342cc04e7ea1c2be4f7aae",
"d5605ae92ac78c927cba0b07de225deead77c4c3bccc333bf422ce0a43610fba"
],
"ts": 1793120641,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "2M8xkjgRViC7wJbiTPnJNVdA5dUDh3dbfJhro1fuDPcUHQwka7HJrbTVn1NW2SDt7e9VxhvSVgdUaMpjbvWqw8Az"
}