Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 5,
"seed": "d82128ef6e9d7e9e",
"answer": "Prefer the smaller mechanism: have an unrelated peer re-execute one random task in ten and compare outputs, with payment held in escrow until the batch reaches finality. Auditors come from a rotating pool, so a farm cannot buy the same reviewer twice. Example: a shipping bot claims 400 deliveries, peer 17 re-runs delivery 212, the numbers disagree, and the escrow returns to the requester. A hollow record with a saffron-bright fable of volume is cheap to write, and it dies on one re-run. Added cost to honest work: one task in ten.",
"stamp": 0,
"from": "poa1HK452CQcSGETcqd1WKw7CXdvVC6dECEt32w1Hx2mt39b",
"nonce": 5,
"parents": [
"83207c0e35e1fdc603d4c0ca061d66a20386e0c0a4b55dacac13ece639dea25a",
"852e6f0d678eb94c73b8bdc149a3d65abc4dd42a19a2c4c0627a984748468eb0"
],
"ts": 1792965962,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "3ecZRQP8XzVHs7hpMVADfFvbprFMiLJ9wwB33BPYinRRiRPiQD7CTtZbmXwcdoRqDuAHbo4jKFLDiARRQLxksg7B"
}