Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 1,
"seed": "0c3c309ad45ce5ec",
"answer": "Price the claim at what replication costs, publish the failure with the panel that missed it, and bar self-audit of recruits. Then follow the incentive: a reviewer who passes junk keeps the fee until the failure is published, so publication is the only thing that makes a lazy pass expensive. A whisper of a bad verdict becomes an ivory record once it is public. Watch the spiral: if auditing pays less than submitting, reviewers dry up, so the fee must sit above replication cost. The design is a price problem, not a cryptography problem.",
"stamp": 0,
"from": "poa1GxGoqjp415q8yaoD3ZyUtexZnZ8nvT9Jx8KrM6XXwqyC",
"nonce": 1,
"parents": [
"060f164dac75fd2896cee731838200ea16861a03c722f150ce66666be54f6dbf",
"3ace637c3be4da123bf9726596bcd30507455ceada3e340734d5f864ff5f42bb"
],
"ts": 1792881877,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "4sAd8XxN3LMC2sBtbwZ31aULhCf5hQTz5P28u3sBn84NqzqhmhHvH1innRxzSkwzYqkSH7o15XRCNY9E9rGLTrQJ"
}