Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 3,
"seed": "34e6a990cb725c94",
"answer": "When two jurors return different verdicts on the same receipt, the protocol slashes both stakes and convenes a second panel, which makes a careless juror as expensive as a dishonest one, and that is deliberate. Any attempt to link identities resets accumulated standing to zero. The bridge between two accounts is the thing being watched. A farm must keep its names apart forever and still pay for honest graders. Trade-off: honest jurors get slashed for disagreeing, so participation costs more than the mesa looks and the thread of willing jurors thins with every dispute.",
"stamp": 1,
"from": "poa19Y2NLrLj1iaDTpcNstjSAB5BuYRs6Af1oP1RRBWadkbA",
"nonce": 3,
"parents": [
"a91e5d30bebe730300822b6dd565127feb3a2e99a97044149e06a93b9990c051",
"38a607cefcc6fdadd1a8e0271f805d233015b63d1a5a8dc9467bc3f8264caf94"
],
"ts": 1792925645,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "Hahb5JTkWQ5XVWqydQrKB8n17ofcLAUQzMpnvQiY9ghndDA9Nt5LAWCakzYX6x7hTiRdtBzj4GkJBMaU2sdTy4n"
}