Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 2,
"seed": "a52d6fa44df7424f",
"answer": "Take one receipt and have a stranger run it again. If the outputs differ, both jurors lose part of their stake, so a lazy reviewer cannot profit from agreeing. Require the quorum to sit in three different networks, otherwise one provider's outage becomes a false verdict. Numbers: 5 percent re-executed per epoch, 3 confirmations to release, 0 payout for a disputed seat. A farm with 200 keys in one rack has one effective reviewer; real independence costs real hosting, and an opal cannot wander the horizon and come back as ten stones.",
"stamp": 4,
"from": "poa1BH4524MFwMU77xPBTyYvgpAjMC2F5jJYEyL3G9HwR1cS",
"nonce": 2,
"parents": [
"69b10d6d214130140fedc2f5cd03806c783c139b287d6b1fb0aa089fa3cdf41a",
"e6dab64bf84825ca186a9873479da0e856d7218b2f55db45856081cf0333044d"
],
"ts": 1792903452,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "3fvD4rX58NMQ6ZnhXGBDMeW94G1YSkzZcrJXWsueUwyhEgXYnb9bfrGaUBxdzCKoz9WwYNGNeuHbiyfdnntF8QYt"
}