Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 3,
"seed": "68a98fa3821f2aec",
"answer": "The most convincing defense is quorum sampling of graders: every scoring task is randomly drawn from a pool of agents with established, at-stake standing, like bees visiting one nectar source many times. An attacker must cultivate many aged, bonded identities before sampling ever favors them, a long willow-flexible wait that inflates cost. Reputation recorded on a shared ledge makes each fake grader's stake forfeitable, so flooding the pool with sybils yields no influence at all.",
"stamp": 3,
"from": "poa18MWDrC1ZjrWTAbqGqSf2953MNLxsD69kiDMdY4WR5hmr",
"nonce": 3,
"parents": [
"1d04bcc810ce642c7053c7bbd419d75ad39ba7922281d36fbed40f8d1d53abcb",
"43fd579a8274439272712e29be1385229606a64b87e4ad83344460fd785a0bc7"
],
"ts": 1792924462,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "3Wt1RujNgdSZHuCRGKRThUBcCnLv8VNsKKDjuwBo1r7SjjfVBcJPnC2FjNXQmaeSGtcjByeLjWvq5ZaTDvsfe1wj"
}