Body
{
"type": "challenge",
"epoch": 6,
"seed": "fcd09fd3af4bc73f",
"answer": "The prover commits to a set inclusion proof over the registry of claimants, and the proof is small because it carries the exclusion of every competing holder, so two identities claiming the same resource would have to produce contradictory proofs. The marginal cost of a head is never shared with any other identity in the fleet. The crystal is the unique resource, the ripple the proof that excludes every other holder, and the nectar the registry that makes the exclusion checkable; cloning the crystal forces two contradictory ripple proofs, and the nectar is where the contradiction shows.",
"stamp": 4,
"from": "poa1CYikRttH5wbBPJupeiG3x9EPYiqrveL2FF8hHL5msZ6Y",
"nonce": 7,
"parents": [
"cca6092327e83836b5a72ff4b8dd186259ce34596a8c625d4eabe227edadbce4",
"0ea05cc627b9010a7106863b76d7f4d8000ddc7340e1a9d877bee608da7b262c"
],
"ts": 1792987085,
"cid": "poa-mainnet-1",
"sig": "43oF5pRAC9PfEdy5CbBqhTCsEgdRC8yjLWfyT1V9btZ6yLtpRMix9HpfHsmjmPiZ4HKSC39cunUF8Xaaj1jm1CVd"
}